Credibility of Scientists: Barrow and Conrad Respond
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Credibility of Scientists: Barrow and Conrad Respond
“Genetically Modified Foods: Breeding Uncertainty” (Schmidt 2005) overlooked many serious concerns about the environmental and health risks of this new technology. Potential problems from antibiotic-resistant genes used in gene-altered crops, risks from unintended effects of the genetic engineering process, the increases in pesticide use stemming from widespread planting of genespliced varietie...
متن کاملChemical Safety Studies: Conrad and Becker Respond
Influence of design charac teris tics on the outcome of retrospective cohort studies. Br J Ind Med 45:624–629. vom Saal FS, Hughes C. 2005. An extensive new literature concerning lowdose effects of bisphenol A shows the need for a new risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect 113:926–933. Sutton et al. and Tweedale both criticize our review (Conrad and Becker 2011) because we did not include i...
متن کاملAssessing the Reliability and Credibility of Industry Science and Scientists
The chemical industry extensively researches and tests its products to implement product stewardship commitments and to ensure compliance with governmental requirements. In this commentary we argue that a wide variety of mechanisms enable policymakers and the public to assure themselves that studies performed or funded by industry are identified as such, meet high scientific standards, and are ...
متن کاملThat s Odd! How Scientists Respond to Anomalous Data
We use an in vivo methodology to investigate the responses of scientists to anomalies. Protocols of 3 scientists performing data analysis in 2 domains were analyzed. We found that the scientists noticed anomalies and paid more attention to them than to expected data. This attention took the form of proposing a hypothesis and then elaborating that hypothesis by reference to other data in the vis...
متن کاملScientific risk communication about controversial issues influences public perceptions of scientists' political orientations and credibility
Many scientists communicate with the public about risks associated with scientific issues, but such communication may have unintended consequences for how the public views the political orientations and the credibility of the communicating scientist. We explore this possibility using an experiment with a nationally representative sample of Americans in the fall of 2015. We find that risk commun...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Environmental Health Perspectives
سال: 2006
ISSN: 0091-6765,1552-9924
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.114-1392249